On August 13, 2026, Assistant Attorney General Colin M. McDonald issued a memo entitled The Fraud Division’s Enforcement Priorities to all personnel of the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) new National Fraud Enforcement Division. As the title suggests, the memo sets out the division’s enforcement priorities. While the memo doesn’t break new ground, it highlights further

The autism therapy industry is a growing target for government enforcement. As I discussed recently in Emerging Target: Federal Enforcement Comes to the Autism Therapy Industry, Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA) therapy — currently the dominant type of autism therapy — has all the markers for healthcare fraud enforcement: explosive reimbursement growth, low barriers to

Trade fraud takes center stage and continues to expand as a priority for the Department of Justice (DOJ).

On July 14, 2026, the DOJ announced its plans to expand trade fraud enforcement by creating the Global Trade & Commerce Enforcement Section (GTCES) within the DOJ’s newly formed National Fraud Enforcement Division.

Notably, this new section

We previously wrote about the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) May 2026 withdrawal of its longstanding no-deny policy, under which a settling party generally could not deny the SEC’s allegations. At that time, we noted that a company settling with the SEC could now issue a statement disagreeing with the agency’s allegations, asserting it

Two recent settlements reached between federal antitrust authorities and antitrust defendants highlight that the federal government is open to settlements in which the defendants agree to curb allegedly anticompetitive conduct. The government publicly tallies the resolution as a win, and companies get out of tricky situations by following through on or expanding compliance initiatives already

China is increasingly on the minds of state legislators and regulators. Across the country, state legislatures and attorneys general have launched a growing wave of laws, enforcement units, and investigations targeting Chinese influence in American commerce, real estate, technology, and healthcare. The result is a rapidly expanding patchwork of state-level obligations that increasingly complements, and

While traditional government enforcement areas, such as healthcare, dominate headlines, one emerging enforcement priority continues to grow, albeit with less fanfare: compliance with cybersecurity requirements in government contracts. The government announced its most recent settlement last month, signaling that these enforcement actions continue to proliferate. 

Why It Matters

Cybersecurity enforcement is here to stay. 

On June 23, 2026, the Department of Justice (DOJ) announced the results of the 2026 National Health Care Fraud Takedown. The so-called “takedowns” have become an annual event, and this year’s involved the largest number of defendants in Takedown history. For healthcare providers and organizations, the takeaway is clear: Enforcement is nationally coordinated, increasingly data-driven

On June 10, 2026, nineteen states and the District of Columbia filed suit in the District of Maryland seeking to halt implementation of Executive Order 14398, which was issued on March 26, 2026. The order requires federal agencies to insert a mandatory contract clause into all contracts, subcontracts, and “contract-like instruments” prohibiting contractors from engaging